Cue validity learning in threat classification judgments
نویسندگان
چکیده
....................................................................................................................................... i Résumé ........................................................................................................................................ i Executive summary ................................................................................................................... iii Sommaire.................................................................................................................................... v Table of contents ....................................................................................................................... ix List of figures ............................................................................................................................ xi List of tables .............................................................................................................................. xi Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. xi
منابع مشابه
Logic, beliefs, and instruction: a test of the default interventionist account of belief bias.
According to dual-process accounts of thinking, belief-based responses on reasoning tasks are generated as default but can be intervened upon in favor of logical responding, given sufficient time, effort, or cognitive resource. In this article, we present the results of 5 experiments in which participants were instructed to evaluate the conclusions of logical arguments on the basis of either th...
متن کاملIntervention in Multiple-Cue Judgment: Not Always for the Better
Previous studies suggest improved learning when participants actively intervene rather than passively observe the stimuli in a judgment task. In two experiments the authors investigate if this improvement generalizes to multiple cue judgment tasks where judgments may be formed from abstract knowledge of cue-criterion relations or exemplar memory. More specific hypotheses were that intervention ...
متن کاملCausal and predictive-value judgments, but not predictions, are based on cue-outcome contingency.
In three experiments, we show that people respond differently when they make predictions as opposed to when they are asked to estimate the causal or the predictive value of cues: Their response to each of those three questions is based on different sets of information. More specifically, we show that prediction judgments depend on the probability of the outcome given the cue, whereas causal and...
متن کاملThe criterion-calibration model of cue interaction in contingency judgments.
Siegel, Allan, Hannah, and Crump (2009) demonstrated that cue interaction effects in human contingency judgments reflect processing that occurs after the acquisition of information. This finding is in conflict with a broad class of theories. We present a new postacquisition model, the criterion-calibration model, that describes cue interaction effects as involving shifts in a report criterion. ...
متن کاملEasy does it: The role of fluency in cue weighting
We propose that people weight fluent, or easy to process, information more heavily than disfluent information when making judgments. Cue fluency was manipulated independent of objective cue validity in three studies, the findings from which support our hypothesis. In Experiment 1, participants weighted a consumer review more heavily when it was written in a clear font than in a less clear font....
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003